Mastering the New Green Market - Part 2 - Collapses Don't Take Turns

 

In our last post, we saw that the economic downturn will make people less green -- in effect, at least — in their values and purchasing decisions.  (Of course, when it comes to purchasing decisions, "in effect" is the reality.)  This bad news is undoubtedly not news to you, but it may be helpful to have deeper insight into the psychodynamics behind it.

What can green marketers do about this?  Before we can arrive at good strategies, we've got to hold fast to the right attitude.  Sure, the situation we're facing is bad for green business.  But what is green business?  Why are you green in the first place?  Early on, we defined "green" as better for the planet.  That means that "less green" is worse for the planet.

That's where we need to keep our attention — in how we think, and especially in how we communicate.  Nobody will care that your business is in trouble, but people still ought to care that their planet is in peril.  Remind them of that, and you'll at least catch their ear.

Collapses don't take turns.  Right now we are facing an economic collapse, but we were already facing an environmental collapse (climate, biodiversity, fisheries, forests, farmland — you know the list.)  The environmental situation was dire a year ago.  It was more dire six months ago.  Is it any less dire now?  Did the impending environmental collapse politely step aside to make room for the newly arrived economic collapse?

Of course not!  Economic collapse may have shoved aside environmental collapse in people's minds, but it didn't shove it aside in the world "out there."  So to the extent that people are now less green in their thinking, the economic collapse has caused their minds to become misaligned with reality.  That's dangerous for anybody — including your customers.

In reality, we have not shifted from facing environmental collapse to facing economic collapse.  We have shifted from facing environmental collapse to facing both environmental and economic collapse.  The fact that the economic collapse is already upon us does not make the environmental collapse any less imminent.  In fact, the environmental collapse is not "on its way" — it's already here.  It's happening at this moment, on an enormous scale.  It's just hidden behind an ever-shrinking facade of affluent appearances.

Nor is the environmental collapse separate from the economy.  In the skyscraper of civilization, ecological services are the foundation and first three stories, the economy is floors four through ten, and all the rest of society is built up from there.  When the foundation and first three floors crumble, what will happen to floors four and above?  If bailing out the banks is hard, try bailing out the ocean!

Most informed people would still agree that saving the environment is important.  But many would argue that fixing the economy is now more urgent.  That's the cognitive error we as green marketers must strive to correct.  One urgency has not displaced another; rather, the urgencies have multiplied.  Unfortunately, the human mind does not easily comprehend multiple urgencies, but that's a reality our species must now outgrow — or else (as Hobbes put it)  we'll soon return to a world where life is nasty, brutish and short.

In the end, even realizing all this, people may still make less green purchasing decisions due to budget constraints.  But the first step in stemming the tide is to help them keep straight in their thinking.  Keep them in touch with the planet.  Let them feel its scream.

Is that all we can do to market green effectively in the new green market?  No.  Read our next post for more.

Keith Borden, Consultant
Brilliant Green Marketing

 

What Does "Green" Mean?

 

In our previous post, we said there are five types of green marketing, but all of them are in terms of the word "green".  Green itself has a range of meanings, however, which can be conveniently grouped into narrow and broad.

narrow:
(a) environmentally sound or beneficial
(b) concerned with the protection of the environment
(c) favoring or supporting environmentalism.

broad:
(d) supporting or espousing global environmental protection,
bioregionalism, social responsibility, or  nonviolence.

adapted from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/green

Notice that definition (a) refer to products, practices and policies, while (c) and (d) refer to people or political parties.  (b) could be either, depending on how we interpret "concerned".  It's reasonable, then, to create a broad definition that encompasses all of these and more.

broad (our definition of "green"):
[favoring or facilitating that which is] better for the planet in its net impact on ecosystem health and human quality of life.

(The portion in brackets may be included or not, to apply the definition sensibly in a given case — for example, to policies or people.)

This definition could apply to just about anything — companies, products, services, people, practices and political parties.  Its key criterion is better for the planet.  That raises the question of just  what is better for the planet — which it should, because there is much debate about that.  It would be too limiting to build an answer to that question into the definition.

On the other hand, the definition does put some boundaries around what "better for the planet" can mean.  Both ecosystem health and human welfare must be served.  Neither can be sacrificed.  If one is favored at the expense of the other, the net balance must be calculated, based on values and criteria that are themselves subject to debate.

In fact, this concept of green leaves a lot open to debate, even as it sets a general direction.  That's an advantage, because it accurately reflects the current state of the green community.

Being so broad is another advantage of this definition, because we now know that issues once seen as separate and competing are intimately intertwined.  Over the long term, human welfare cannot be maintained without a high level of ecosystem health, and ecosystem health will not be maintained without a high level of human welfare. 

So it makes sense to address both simultaneously.  And "better for the planet" is a single, simple, unifying concept that can aid our thinking it all areas, from policy to purchasing to marketing.

But not everyone is green, and not all "greens" are the same shade of green.  In our next post we'll look at the different shades of green.

Keith Borden, Consultant
Brilliant Green Marketing

BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.8.001.
Copyright © 2007-2009 Brilliant Green Marketing.   All rights reserved.  Terms of Use.
http://brilliantgreenmarketing.com   Site Photography by Neil Beaty
sustainable environmental marketing, Boston, MA, Mass, Massachusetts, New England, USA

Phone: 978-663-3801